FRQIX vs. FFFCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX returned 4.98%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for FFFCX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRQIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.

Performance

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQIX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than FFFCX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX has underperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 4.98%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.

FRQIX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

FFFCX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 9.08%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	4.05%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	5.33%	11.39%	5.26%	9.82%	-13.21%	5.64%	11.09%	14.34%	-3.74%	12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQIX and FFFCX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.98

The correlation between FRQIX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRQIX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQIX

FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FFFCX

FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRQIX	FFFCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.59	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	3.75	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.53	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	3.20	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	13.95	-0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQIX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRQIX	FFFCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.59	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.58	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.68	-0.12

Drawdowns

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQIX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQIX and FFFCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQIX	FFFCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.01%	-36.88%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-4.00%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.21%	-5.83%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.04%	-18.35%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.04%	-18.35%	+1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-4.57%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.92%	-0.12%

Volatility

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) is 1.66%, while Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that FRQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRQIX	FFFCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	2.02%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.42%	4.15%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	4.95%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.57%	6.38%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.33%	6.30%	-0.97%

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQIX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund	4.66%	4.97%	2.99%	2.72%	7.23%	9.33%	6.01%	5.78%	6.98%	4.82%	3.22%	3.68%
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.04%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQIX and FFFCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FRQIX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRQIX or FFFCX?

FFFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQIX dropped -38.01% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.