FRQIX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
FRQIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | -0.50% | 9.97% | 4.48% | 8.52% | -12.39% | 3.82% | 9.58% | 12.63% | -2.84% | 10.64% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRQIX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 4.73%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
FRQIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRQIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
FRQIX
FASGX
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRQIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.21 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.73 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.55 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 6.89 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRQIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.21 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.70 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRQIX and FASGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.07% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 2.75% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 3.51% | 3.14% | 5.60% | 16.32% | 2.43% | 4.08% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRQIX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQIX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRQIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.01% | -47.35% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -9.07% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -23.54% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.04% | -27.20% | +10.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -7.95% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -6.74% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 2.04% | -1.19% |
Volatility
FRQIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) is 1.95%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that FRQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRQIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 4.57% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 7.78% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.61% | 12.82% | -8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 12.14% | -6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 12.56% | -7.23% |