FRQIX vs. FASGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - FRQIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FRQIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

FRQIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FRQIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FASGX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 7.00%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 9.58%
• ALL TIME*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FRQIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.60%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	10.24%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQIX and FASGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007	0.92

The correlation between FRQIX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRQIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRQIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRQIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRQIX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.13	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQIX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-47.35%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.95%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.63%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.69%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRQIX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.54%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.46%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.68%	—

FRQIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than FASGX's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.65%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	2.78%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQIX and FASGX in my portfolio?

FRQIX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.