FRQIX vs. TLTIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) and TLTIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FRQIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TLTIX.

Performance

FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FRQIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TLTIX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: 2.88%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: 5.93%
• ALL TIME*: 6.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	3.60%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.58%	12.63%	-2.84%	10.64%
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund	4.20%	12.10%	7.39%	11.41%	-13.25%	6.94%	11.97%	15.58%	-2.88%	9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQIX and TLTIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009	0.94

The correlation between FRQIX and TLTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRQIX vs. TLTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRQIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLTIX

TLTIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
TLTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TLTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TLTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TLTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TLTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRQIX	TLTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.37	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQIX	TLTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.15%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.32%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.89%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.58%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRQIX	TLTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.76%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	7.55%	—

FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTIX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Dividend Comparison

FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than TLTIX's 6.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I	2.78%	3.14%	2.97%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.51%	3.14%	5.60%	16.32%	2.43%	4.08%
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund	6.18%	6.44%	6.57%	3.44%	3.48%	4.81%	2.36%	2.34%	3.11%	0.18%	2.29%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQIX and TLTIX in my portfolio?

FRQIX and TLTIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.