FRQIX vs. TLTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX).
FRQIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. TLTIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | -0.50% | 9.97% | 4.48% | 8.52% | -12.39% | 3.82% | 9.58% | 12.63% | -2.84% | 10.64% |
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | -1.63% | 12.10% | 7.39% | 11.41% | -13.25% | 6.94% | 11.97% | 15.58% | -2.88% | 9.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRQIX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than TLTIX's -1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX has underperformed TLTIX with an annualized return of 4.73%, while TLTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.69% annualized return.
FRQIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
TLTIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTIX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRQIX vs. TLTIX — Risk / Return Rank
FRQIX
TLTIX
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.98 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.85 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 7.83 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.51 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.76 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRQIX and TLTIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Dividend Comparison
FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than TLTIX's 6.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.07% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 2.75% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 3.51% | 3.14% | 5.60% | 16.32% | 2.43% | 4.08% |
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | 6.55% | 6.44% | 6.57% | 3.44% | 3.48% | 4.81% | 2.36% | 2.34% | 3.11% | 0.18% | 2.29% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRQIX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, which is greater than TLTIX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQIX and TLTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.01% | -18.15% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -4.59% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -18.15% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.04% | -18.15% | +1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -4.15% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -2.62% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.08% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) is 1.95%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that FRQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 2.39% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 3.76% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.61% | 6.34% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 7.89% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 7.52% | -2.19% |