FRQIX vs. TLTIX
FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) and TLTIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX returned 4.98%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for TLTIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRQIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TLTIX.
Performance
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRQIX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than TLTIX's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQIX has underperformed TLTIX with an annualized return of 4.98%, while TLTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.25% annualized return.
FRQIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
TLTIX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.60% | 9.97% | 4.48% | 8.52% | -12.39% | 3.82% | 9.58% | 12.63% | -2.84% | 10.64% |
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | 4.96% | 12.10% | 7.39% | 11.41% | -13.25% | 6.94% | 11.97% | 15.58% | -2.88% | 9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRQIX and TLTIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FRQIX and TLTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRQIX vs. TLTIX — Risk / Return Rank
FRQIX
TLTIX
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.97 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 13.02 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRQIX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, which is greater than TLTIX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQIX and TLTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.01% | -18.15% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -4.32% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.21% | -9.76% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -18.15% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.04% | -18.15% | +1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.17% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -2.59% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.98% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) is 1.78%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund (TLTIX) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that FRQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRQIX | TLTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.37% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.68% | 4.70% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 5.60% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 7.97% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 7.57% | -2.23% |
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTIX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRQIX vs. TLTIX - Dividend Comparison
FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than TLTIX's 6.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.22% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 2.75% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 3.51% | 3.14% | 5.60% | 16.32% | 2.43% | 4.08% |
TLTIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2010 Fund | 6.14% | 6.44% | 6.57% | 3.44% | 3.48% | 4.81% | 2.36% | 2.34% | 3.11% | 0.18% | 2.29% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FRQIX and TLTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TLTIX has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FRQIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQIX dropped -38.01% vs TLTIX's -18.15%.
TLTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRQIX and TLTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer