FRIZ vs. DES
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DES is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). FRIZ is actively managed, while DES is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DES.
Performance
FRIZ vs. DES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than DES's 24.63% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 30.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
FRIZ vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 5.06% | 3.22% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 24.63% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and DES is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DES
FRIZ vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRIZ | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum DES drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and DES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -65.48% | +57.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -9.63% | +8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. DES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 16.02% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 19.46% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 21.91% | -12.04% |
FRIZ vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. DES - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DES's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.22% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.80% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and DES have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.80% for FRIZ.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while DES is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.38% for DES.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and DES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer