PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 9.62% return.


DES

1D
0.99%
1M
0.53%
YTD
16.63%
6M
17.07%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
8.17%

FDVV

1D
0.05%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.62%
6M
10.33%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
16.63%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
9.62%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and FDVV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.82

The correlation between DES and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DES vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
FDVV

Financial Services

23.7%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
13.6%

Industrials

13.3%
3.4%

Energy

10.7%

-

Real Estate

9.6%
10.1%

Basic Materials

6.0%

-

Technology

5.5%
29.1%

Utilities

4.6%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
11.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.7%

Healthcare

1.7%
3.1%

Financial Services

DES
23.7%
FDVV
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
14.8%
FDVV
13.6%

Industrials

DES
13.3%
FDVV
3.4%

Energy

DES
10.7%
FDVV

-

Real Estate

DES
9.6%
FDVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

DES
6.0%
FDVV

-

Technology

DES
5.5%
FDVV
29.1%

Utilities

DES
4.6%
FDVV
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.3%
FDVV
11.0%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
FDVV
3.7%

Healthcare

DES
1.7%
FDVV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.60

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.63

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.85

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.48

11.90

-1.42

DES vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.60

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.94

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.80

-0.48

Drawdowns

DES vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-40.25%

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-9.30%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-15.90%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-20.18%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-3.81%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.23%

+0.45%

Volatility

DES vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.20%. This indicates that DES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.20%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

7.92%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

9.99%

+6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

14.74%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

17.00%

+4.97%

DES vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than FDVV's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.37%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.69%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DES and FDVV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DES has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to FDVV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.73% vs 6.21% for DES. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.37% for DES.

DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer