PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. IWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed IWN with an annualized return of 8.17%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


DES

1D
0.99%
1M
0.53%
YTD
16.63%
6M
17.07%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
8.17%

IWN

1D
1.06%
1M
3.25%
YTD
18.97%
6M
20.27%
1Y
45.20%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
16.63%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
18.97%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and IWN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.96

The correlation between DES and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DES vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
IWN

Financial Services

23.7%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
8.7%

Industrials

13.3%
11.1%

Energy

10.7%
9.2%

Real Estate

9.6%
10.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%
5.4%

Technology

5.5%
12.4%

Utilities

4.6%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
1.6%

Healthcare

1.7%
8.8%

Financial Services

DES
23.7%
IWN
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
14.8%
IWN
8.7%

Industrials

DES
13.3%
IWN
11.1%

Energy

DES
10.7%
IWN
9.2%

Real Estate

DES
9.6%
IWN
10.2%

Basic Materials

DES
6.0%
IWN
5.4%

Technology

DES
5.5%
IWN
12.4%

Utilities

DES
4.6%
IWN
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.3%
IWN
2.0%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
IWN
1.6%

Healthcare

DES
1.7%
IWN
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESIWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.56

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.56

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

5.33

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.48

17.97

-7.49

DES vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESIWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.56

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.32

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.39

-0.07

Drawdowns

DES vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than IWN's maximum drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and IWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESIWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-61.55%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-8.45%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-26.70%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-26.70%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-46.08%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.17%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-10.16%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.51%

+0.17%

Volatility

DES vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 4.24%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESIWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.78%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

11.80%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

17.75%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

21.43%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

23.39%

-1.42%

DES vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than IWN's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.37%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.44%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DES and IWN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWN has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to DES (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs IWN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.30% vs 8.17% for DES. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.30% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.44% for IWN.

DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.24% for IWN.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and IWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer