PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIMX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIMX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FRIMX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 4.21%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


FRIMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.27%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.21%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
4.05%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIMX and FASGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.89

The correlation between FRIMX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (5 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIMX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIMXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.49

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.39

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

14.98

-1.93

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIMX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIMXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.69

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.79

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Drawdowns

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIMX drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIMX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIMXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-47.35%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-7.95%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.97%

-12.80%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-23.54%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.12%

-27.20%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-6.71%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.79%

-0.99%

Volatility

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) is 1.65%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that FRIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIMXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

3.30%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

8.39%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

10.34%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

12.27%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

12.65%

-8.13%

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIMX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FRIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.08%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRIMX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FRIMX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRIMX dropped -33.73% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIMX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer