FRIMX vs. PLTNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX).
FRIMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. PLTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | -0.51% | 9.94% | 4.30% | 8.06% | -11.66% | 2.78% | 8.57% | 10.57% | -1.82% | 7.08% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | -4.53% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIMX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than PLTNX's -4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FRIMX has underperformed PLTNX with an annualized return of 3.92%, while PLTNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.48% annualized return.
FRIMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
PLTNX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTNX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRIMX vs. PLTNX — Risk / Return Rank
FRIMX
PLTNX
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRIMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.02 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.54 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.22 | +0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 6.15 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRIMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.02 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIMX and PLTNX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Dividend Comparison
FRIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than PLTNX's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | 3.15% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 2.82% | 4.52% | 3.54% | 2.41% | 2.56% | 4.67% | 8.56% | 1.67% | 1.68% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.81% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIMX drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTNX drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIMX and PLTNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -32.71% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.44% | -11.90% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.12% | -25.48% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.12% | -32.71% | +16.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -8.66% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -4.83% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 2.36% | -1.51% |
Volatility
FRIMX vs. PLTNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) is 1.95%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that FRIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRIMX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 5.01% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 9.07% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 16.20% | -11.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 15.39% | -10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 15.77% | -11.30% |