PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDTX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDTX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's 2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDTX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.52% annualized return.


FRDTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.29%
YTD
5.31%
6M
4.76%
1Y
14.16%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
11.95%

FKRCX

1D
-3.75%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
2.82%
6M
14.74%
1Y
76.92%
3Y*
51.86%
5Y*
20.47%
10Y*
15.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
5.31%11.13%21.73%11.27%-11.36%25.67%15.42%28.87%-5.99%19.19%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
2.82%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDTX and FKRCX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1995

0.24

The correlation between FRDTX and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDTX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDTX
FRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDTXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.53

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

7.05

+0.68

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDTX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDTXFKRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.87

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.19

+0.38

Drawdowns

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDTX drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDTX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDTXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-78.85%

+26.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-31.15%

+23.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-31.15%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-48.79%

+27.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-49.54%

+14.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-23.58%

+23.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-33.74%

+27.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

11.17%

-9.32%

Volatility

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) is 2.17%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 14.06%. This indicates that FRDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDTXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

14.06%

-11.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

35.36%

-27.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

42.23%

-32.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

33.84%

-16.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

32.87%

-14.74%

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDTX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

FRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, less than FKRCX's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.45%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
9.22%9.73%19.21%3.91%4.27%3.95%0.17%2.35%4.44%2.59%2.61%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDTX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to FRDTX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDTX dropped -52.13% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDTX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer