FRDTX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
FRDTX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 22, 1996. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
FRDTX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRDTX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C | -2.75% | 11.13% | 21.73% | 11.27% | -11.36% | 25.67% | 15.42% | 28.87% | -5.99% | 19.19% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.71% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDTX achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDTX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 11.32%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
FRDTX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
EMO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 33.42%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDTX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRDTX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
FRDTX
EMO
FRDTX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDTX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 1.00 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.81 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 2.44 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDTX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.21 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.22 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.11 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDTX and EMO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FRDTX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
FRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, more than EMO's 8.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C | 10.01% | 9.73% | 19.21% | 3.91% | 4.27% | 3.95% | 0.17% | 2.35% | 4.44% | 2.59% | 2.61% | 4.58% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.40% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
FRDTX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDTX drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDTX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDTX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -95.06% | +42.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -18.81% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -28.59% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -93.02% | +58.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -5.90% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -32.26% | +25.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 6.23% | -3.92% |
Volatility
FRDTX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) is 4.23%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that FRDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRDTX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.53% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 11.68% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 21.67% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 26.82% | -9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 41.42% | -23.30% |