FRDTX vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
FRDTX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 22, 1996. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Performance
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C | -2.75% | 11.13% | 21.73% | 11.27% | -11.36% | 25.67% | 15.42% | 28.87% | -5.99% | 19.19% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.60% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDTX achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDTX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.32%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.
FRDTX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRDTX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
FRDTX
DGRO
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDTX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.14 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 1.66 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.48 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 6.80 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDTX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.14 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.74 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.77 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.73 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDTX and DGRO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
FRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, more than DGRO's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C | 10.01% | 9.73% | 19.21% | 3.91% | 4.27% | 3.95% | 0.17% | 2.35% | 4.44% | 2.59% | 2.61% | 4.58% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDTX drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDTX and DGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDTX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -35.10% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.92% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -19.31% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -35.10% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -4.70% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -3.48% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.37% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FRDTX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.57%. This indicates that FRDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRDTX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.57% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 7.21% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 14.47% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 13.84% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.63% | +1.49% |