FRD vs. NUS
FRD (Friedman Industries, Incorporated) and NUS (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. FRD operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while NUS operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FRD returned 20.51%/yr vs -16.82%/yr for NUS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRD vs. NUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRD achieves a 65.18% return, which is significantly higher than NUS's -47.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FRD has outperformed NUS with an annualized return of 20.51%, while NUS has yielded a comparatively lower -16.82% annualized return.
FRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 47.21%
- YTD
- 65.18%
- 6M
- 62.79%
- 1Y
- 112.50%
- 3Y*
- 53.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.93%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
NUS
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -15.28%
- YTD
- -47.77%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -34.29%
- 3Y*
- -44.80%
- 5Y*
- -36.73%
- 10Y*
- -16.82%
FRD vs. NUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 65.18% | 35.33% | -0.26% | 58.98% | 5.34% | 37.91% | 15.73% | -12.71% | 26.02% | -14.17% |
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | -47.77% | 43.29% | -63.67% | -51.07% | -13.92% | -4.32% | 38.67% | -30.98% | -8.32% | 46.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRD and NUS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 1996 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FRD and NUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FRD:
$3.73
NUS:
$1.10
FRD:
9.04
NUS:
4.51
FRD:
0.20
NUS:
0.01
FRD:
0.27
NUS:
0.17
FRD:
$646.91M
NUS:
$1.44B
FRD:
$32.71M
NUS:
$998.90M
FRD:
$26.09M
NUS:
$115.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRD vs. NUS — Risk / Return Rank
FRD
NUS
FRD vs. NUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) and Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRD | NUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.90 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | -0.57 | +5.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | -1.13 | +10.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRD vs. NUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRD drawdown since its inception was -71.00%, smaller than the maximum NUS drawdown of -94.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRD and NUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRD | NUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.00% | -94.67% | +23.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -60.64% | +35.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.49% | -83.62% | +37.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.01% | -89.87% | +39.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.09% | -92.43% | +27.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -94.67% | +84.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.67% | -48.16% | +13.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 30.37% | -18.85% |
Volatility
FRD vs. NUS - Volatility Comparison
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) has a higher volatility of 29.09% compared to Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) at 10.94%. This indicates that FRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRD | NUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.09% | 10.94% | +18.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.67% | 33.73% | +4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.96% | 52.90% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.05% | 47.10% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.68% | 49.05% | +0.63% |
Dividends
FRD vs. NUS - Dividend Comparison
FRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than NUS's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.85% | 1.17% | 2.66% | 1.70% | 0.70% | 0.60% | 0.90% |
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 4.86% | 2.49% | 3.48% | 8.03% | 3.65% | 3.00% | 2.75% | 3.61% | 2.38% | 2.11% | 2.97% | 3.69% |
Financials
FRD vs. NUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Friedman Industries, Incorporated and Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRD vs. NUS - Profitability Comparison
FRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 191.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 214.46M and revenue of 320.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.9%.
FRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported an operating income of 11.83M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
NUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
FRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a net income of 9.19M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
NUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 1.84M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRD and NUS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRD has higher volatility (29.09%) compared to NUS (10.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRD dropped -71.00% vs NUS's -94.67%.
FRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRD and NUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer