FQTEX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQTEX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FQTEX returned 11.50%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQTEX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTEX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.89% return.

FQTEX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 24.92%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: —

PALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQTEX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E	9.32%	18.87%	11.38%	11.57%	-0.98%	25.45%	3.35%	16.31%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTEX and PALDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.81

The correlation between FQTEX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FQTEX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTEX

FQTEX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FQTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FQTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FQTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FQTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FQTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQTEX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.73	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.92	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.52	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	3.62	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.79	17.16	+0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTEX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQTEX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.73	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.79	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.81	-0.01

Drawdowns

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTEX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTEX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQTEX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.47%	-26.16%	-7.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.77%	-5.96%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	-16.06%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.47%	-20.47%	+4.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-4.09%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.25%	+0.21%

Volatility

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) is 1.83%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that FQTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQTEX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	2.30%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	6.18%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.23%	7.89%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.95%	12.11%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	12.69%	+4.07%

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FQTEX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FQTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FQTEX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E	5.81%	4.74%	6.17%	6.56%	7.78%	10.36%	4.31%	4.13%	0.00%	0.00%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQTEX and PALDX in my portfolio?

FQTEX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQTEX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FQTEX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTEX dropped -33.47% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.