PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQAL vs. TDVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQAL vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 8.04% return.


FQAL

1D
-0.86%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
6.05%
6M
4.85%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*

TDVG

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.22%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.41%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQAL vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
6.05%16.93%21.92%24.20%-19.70%32.13%12.60%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
8.04%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%26.20%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and TDVG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020

0.91

The correlation between FQAL and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FQAL vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FQAL
TDVG

Technology

37.7%
26.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
19.3%

Communication Services

10.0%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.2%

Industrials

8.8%
13.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
6.9%

Energy

3.5%
5.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.6%

Utilities

2.0%
3.8%

Technology

FQAL
37.7%
TDVG
26.2%

Financial Services

FQAL
11.6%
TDVG
19.3%

Communication Services

FQAL
10.0%
TDVG
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FQAL
9.2%
TDVG
7.2%

Industrials

FQAL
8.8%
TDVG
13.6%

Healthcare

FQAL
8.7%
TDVG
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

FQAL
4.3%
TDVG
6.9%

Energy

FQAL
3.5%
TDVG
5.3%

Basic Materials

FQAL
2.1%
TDVG
2.8%

Real Estate

FQAL
2.1%
TDVG
1.6%

Utilities

FQAL
2.0%
TDVG
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQAL vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL
FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQALTDVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.44

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.13

10.01

+0.12

FQAL vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and TDVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQALTDVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-19.20%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-7.24%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-14.02%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-19.20%

-6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.82%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-3.73%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.76%

+0.12%

Volatility

FQAL vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.78%. This indicates that FQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQALTDVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.78%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

7.61%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

9.79%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

13.92%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

13.90%

+3.67%

FQAL vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQAL vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than TDVG's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
1.19%1.12%1.20%1.35%1.52%1.17%1.46%1.55%1.73%1.53%0.43%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQAL and TDVG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQAL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 11.74% vs 10.19% for TDVG. On fees, FQAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FQAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.50% for TDVG.

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQAL and TDVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer