FQAL vs. SQLV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. FQAL is passively managed, while SQLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FQAL returned 11.43%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for SQLV. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SQLV.

Performance

FQAL vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 23.57% return.

FQAL

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.45%

SQLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 23.57%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	$3.79M	$3.24M	$3.26M
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	$1.18M	$614.27K	$248.07K

FQAL vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	9.52%	16.93%	21.92%	24.20%	-19.70%	32.13%	16.17%	28.12%	-4.39%	11.64%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	23.57%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	37.14%	7.13%	17.41%	-10.55%	8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and SQLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017	0.58

The correlation between FQAL and SQLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FQAL vs. SQLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FQAL	SQLV
Technology	36.7%	15.9%
Financial Services	12.0%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	13.8%
Industrials	9.4%	10.3%
Communication Services	9.3%	6.0%
Healthcare	9.1%	18.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	7.4%
Energy	3.3%	4.0%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.8%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.9%
Utilities	2.0%	0.2%

Return for Risk

FQAL vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FQAL

FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 66
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 86
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FQAL vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FQAL	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.02	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.97	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.95	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	12.39	-3.19

FQAL vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and SQLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and SQLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQAL	SQLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-48.34%	+14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-8.84%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-26.86%	+9.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-26.86%	+1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-1.74%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-8.80%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.81%	-0.91%

Volatility

FQAL vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.43%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQAL	SQLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.43%	4.34%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	11.60%	-2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	17.33%	-5.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	20.87%	-4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	23.24%	-5.75%

FQAL vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQAL vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than SQLV's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	1.15%	1.12%	1.20%	1.35%	1.52%	1.17%	1.46%	1.55%	1.73%	1.53%	0.43%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	0.95%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQAL and SQLV in my portfolio?

FQAL and SQLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQAL or SQLV?

SQLV has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FQAL (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs SQLV's -48.34%.

Which ETF is better, FQAL or SQLV?

On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 11.43% vs 8.18% for SQLV. On fees, FQAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FQAL or SQLV?

Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FQAL or SQLV?

FQAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FQAL or SQLV?

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.95% for SQLV.

What is the main difference between FQAL and SQLV?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.60% for SQLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.