PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 34.41% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FPXI has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 12.89%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


FPXI

1D
-0.36%
1M
13.37%
YTD
34.41%
6M
33.60%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
27.44%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
12.89%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
34.41%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and FDL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between FPXI and FDL has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FPXI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXI
FDL

Technology

31.4%
1.1%

Industrials

22.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

14.8%
0.3%

Healthcare

11.9%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
3.8%

Financial Services

5.0%
15.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
10.6%

Energy

2.3%
27.3%

Utilities

0.9%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Technology

FPXI
31.4%
FDL
1.1%

Industrials

FPXI
22.6%
FDL
3.8%

Basic Materials

FPXI
14.8%
FDL
0.3%

Healthcare

FPXI
11.9%
FDL
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FPXI
7.2%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

FPXI
5.0%
FDL
15.1%

Communication Services

FPXI
2.5%
FDL
10.6%

Energy

FPXI
2.3%
FDL
27.3%

Utilities

FPXI
0.9%
FDL
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

FPXI
0.8%
FDL
14.7%

Real Estate

FPXI
0.6%
FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXIFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.56

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

13.56

-1.90

FPXI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXIFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.88

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.66

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-65.93%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-4.27%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-12.24%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.75%

-16.46%

-34.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.78%

-41.40%

-14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-2.18%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-9.66%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

1.75%

+2.52%

Volatility

FPXI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that FPXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

2.85%

+6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

7.87%

+11.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

11.28%

+12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

14.31%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

17.11%

+4.07%

FPXI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.59%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXI and FDL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 12.89% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.59% for FPXI.

FPXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.45% for FDL.

FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer