PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXI vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 34.41% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.96% return.


FPXI

1D
-0.36%
1M
13.37%
YTD
34.41%
6M
33.60%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
27.44%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
12.89%

EFAS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
12.96%
6M
17.29%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
34.41%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
12.96%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and EFAS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.51

The correlation between FPXI and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPXI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXI
EFAS

Technology

31.4%
0.1%

Industrials

22.6%
9.9%

Basic Materials

14.8%
1.8%

Healthcare

11.9%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
1.9%

Financial Services

5.0%
30.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
8.6%

Energy

2.3%
13.7%

Utilities

0.9%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
8.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
11.3%

Technology

FPXI
31.4%
EFAS
0.1%

Industrials

FPXI
22.6%
EFAS
9.9%

Basic Materials

FPXI
14.8%
EFAS
1.8%

Healthcare

FPXI
11.9%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FPXI
7.2%
EFAS
1.9%

Financial Services

FPXI
5.0%
EFAS
30.1%

Communication Services

FPXI
2.5%
EFAS
8.6%

Energy

FPXI
2.3%
EFAS
13.7%

Utilities

FPXI
0.9%
EFAS
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

FPXI
0.8%
EFAS
8.1%

Real Estate

FPXI
0.6%
EFAS
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXIEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.44

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

14.48

-2.83

FPXI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXIEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.73

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.78

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXIEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-44.38%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-5.30%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-11.84%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.75%

-28.81%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-3.01%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-7.08%

-13.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

1.99%

+2.28%

Volatility

FPXI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that FPXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXIEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

2.96%

+5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

8.20%

+11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

10.60%

+12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

15.59%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

18.33%

+2.85%

FPXI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.59%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.04% vs 4.04% for FPXI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.59% for FPXI.

FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXI and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer