PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXI vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 21.51% return.


FPXI

1D
0.39%
1M
-11.07%
6M
7.83%
YTD
16.79%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
11.04%
ALL TIME*
8.39%

EFAS

1D
0.79%
1M
7.15%
6M
15.12%
YTD
21.51%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$903.64K$563.02K$421.49K
$2.73M$3.76M$4.60M

FPXI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
16.79%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
21.51%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and EFAS is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016

0.49

The correlation between FPXI and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPXI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXI
EFAS

Technology

42.9%
0.1%

Industrials

21.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

9.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.9%

Financial Services

6.2%
35.3%

Energy

3.7%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
7.7%

Communication Services

1.3%
8.9%

Utilities

0.7%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.5%
15.6%

Technology

FPXI
42.9%
EFAS
0.1%

Industrials

FPXI
21.0%
EFAS
6.6%

Healthcare

FPXI
9.1%
EFAS
0.1%

Basic Materials

FPXI
6.6%
EFAS
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FPXI
6.3%
EFAS
1.9%

Financial Services

FPXI
6.2%
EFAS
35.3%

Energy

FPXI
3.7%
EFAS
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

FPXI
2.2%
EFAS
7.7%

Communication Services

FPXI
1.3%
EFAS
8.9%

Utilities

FPXI
0.7%
EFAS
11.8%

Real Estate

FPXI
0.5%
EFAS
15.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPXI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXIEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.53

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

6.26

-5.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

15.38

-11.19

FPXI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXIEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-44.38%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.12%

-5.30%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-11.84%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.75%

-28.81%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.17%

-0.12%

-20.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-6.98%

-13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

2.15%

+4.55%

Volatility

FPXI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.45%. This indicates that FPXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXIEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.57%

2.45%

+10.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.10%

8.65%

+18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.35%

10.98%

+19.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

15.52%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

18.23%

+3.68%

FPXI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than EFAS's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.49%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.68%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to EFAS (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 14.40% vs 1.10% for FPXI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 14.40% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.68% for FPXI.

FPXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.55% for EFAS.

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXI and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer