PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOVL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%6.22%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and SCHG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FOVL and SCHG has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FOVL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FOVL
SCHG

Financial Services

44.6%
6.7%

Industrials

12.8%
5.8%

Energy

7.7%
0.8%

Utilities

7.5%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
1.7%

Technology

5.0%
46.3%

Healthcare

4.9%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.7%
16.0%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Financial Services

FOVL
44.6%
SCHG
6.7%

Industrials

FOVL
12.8%
SCHG
5.8%

Energy

FOVL
7.7%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

FOVL
7.5%
SCHG
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FOVL
5.2%
SCHG
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

FOVL
5.0%
SCHG
1.7%

Technology

FOVL
5.0%
SCHG
46.3%

Healthcare

FOVL
4.9%
SCHG
7.7%

Communication Services

FOVL
4.7%
SCHG
16.0%

Real Estate

FOVL
2.6%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

FOVL

-

SCHG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOVL

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOVL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOVL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOVLSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

Volatility

FOVL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

FOVL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FOVL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FOVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.55%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FOVL.

FOVL has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

FOVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer