FOCT vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

FOCT vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

FOCT

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 5.29%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: 11.88%
• 5Y*: 8.83%
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 6M: 18.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCT vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October	5.72%	6.40%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCT and NVDO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

FOCT vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCT

FOCT Risk / Return Rank: 76
FOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCT vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOCT	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.48	—	—

Drawdowns

FOCT vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOCT	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-16.25%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-4.73%	+3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-4.97%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FOCT	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.07%	32.12%	-24.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.11%	32.12%	-21.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.89%	32.12%	-21.23%

FOCT vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOCT vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.

Position	TTM	2025
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOCT and NVDO in my portfolio?

FOCT and NVDO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FOCT or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOCT or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FOCT or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.

What is the main difference between FOCT and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.77% for NVDO.