FOCT vs. JULB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

FOCT vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.08% return.

FOCT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: 6.85%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.20%

JULB

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 7.15%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October	$750.38K	$749.44K	$2.00M
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	$122.17K	$181.25K	$221.75K

FOCT vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October	7.68%	2.88%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	8.08%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCT and JULB is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

FOCT vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOCT

FOCT Risk / Return Rank: 85
FOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

JULB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOCT vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOCT	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	—	—

Drawdowns

FOCT vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOCT	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-5.24%	-8.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.20%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-0.78%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FOCT	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.16%	6.81%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.14%	6.81%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	6.81%	+4.01%

FOCT vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOCT vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FOCT nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOCT and JULB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FOCT and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FOCT or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOCT or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FOCT or JULB?

FOCT and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FOCT and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.25% for JULB.