PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNY vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNY vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNY achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FNY has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 13.68%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


FNY

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.61%
YTD
14.89%
6M
14.12%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
13.68%

VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNY vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNY
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
14.89%14.03%18.09%21.13%-23.80%13.46%36.97%32.54%-7.53%25.12%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNY and VO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.90

The correlation between FNY and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNY vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNY
VO

Industrials

25.4%
17.9%

Healthcare

18.6%
7.6%

Technology

17.5%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

9.4%
12.8%

Real Estate

6.1%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.8%

Energy

2.0%
8.5%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.2%

Utilities

0.5%
8.3%

Industrials

FNY
25.4%
VO
17.9%

Healthcare

FNY
18.6%
VO
7.6%

Technology

FNY
17.5%
VO
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNY
12.7%
VO
8.6%

Financial Services

FNY
9.4%
VO
12.8%

Real Estate

FNY
6.1%
VO
5.4%

Communication Services

FNY
3.6%
VO
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNY
2.2%
VO
4.8%

Energy

FNY
2.0%
VO
8.5%

Basic Materials

FNY
1.9%
VO
4.2%

Utilities

FNY
0.5%
VO
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNY vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNY
FNY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNY vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNYVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.23

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

8.50

+0.80

FNY vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNY and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNYVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.48

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.45

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.61

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Drawdowns

FNY vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNYVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-58.87%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-8.17%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-19.02%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-27.57%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-39.37%

+0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.45%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-7.86%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.14%

+1.16%

Volatility

FNY vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.99%. This indicates that FNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNYVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

2.99%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

9.21%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

12.34%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

17.59%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

18.95%

+3.39%

FNY vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNY vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

FNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNY
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.03%0.03%0.56%0.24%0.24%0.00%0.25%0.28%0.06%0.21%0.60%0.46%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNY and VO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNY has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, FNY leads with 13.68% vs 11.55% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNY has performed better with a 13.68% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.03% for FNY.

FNY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.03% for VO.

FNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNY and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer