PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. CSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. CSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than CSD's 40.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FNX has underperformed CSD with an annualized return of 11.88%, while CSD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


FNX

1D
0.72%
1M
1.59%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.05%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.88%

CSD

1D
0.36%
1M
5.52%
YTD
40.17%
6M
38.88%
1Y
73.14%
3Y*
37.02%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. CSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
12.62%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
40.17%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and CSD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.84

The correlation between FNX and CSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNX vs. CSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
CSD

Industrials

19.3%
31.1%

Financial Services

18.6%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
2.9%

Healthcare

10.4%
13.1%

Technology

9.5%
18.6%

Real Estate

8.6%
5.1%

Energy

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%
11.1%

Utilities

2.7%
7.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.0%

Industrials

FNX
19.3%
CSD
31.1%

Financial Services

FNX
18.6%
CSD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
14.4%
CSD
2.9%

Healthcare

FNX
10.4%
CSD
13.1%

Technology

FNX
9.5%
CSD
18.6%

Real Estate

FNX
8.6%
CSD
5.1%

Energy

FNX
6.2%
CSD

-

Consumer Defensive

FNX
4.0%
CSD

-

Basic Materials

FNX
3.1%
CSD
11.1%

Utilities

FNX
2.7%
CSD
7.0%

Communication Services

FNX
2.2%
CSD
9.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. CSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. CSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNXCSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

6.48

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

25.42

-15.00

FNX vs. CSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the CSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and CSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNXCSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.09

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.71

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.43

-0.01

Drawdowns

FNX vs. CSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum CSD drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and CSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXCSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-70.47%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-11.34%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-30.15%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-30.15%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-57.55%

+13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-14.23%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.89%

-0.21%

Volatility

FNX vs. CSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) is 4.33%, while Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that FNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXCSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

5.60%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

18.29%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

23.82%

-7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

23.26%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

24.83%

-2.87%

FNX vs. CSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CSD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. CSD - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than CSD's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.11%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.82%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX and CSD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to FNX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs CSD's -70.47%.

On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 14.06% vs 11.88% for FNX. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

FNX has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.65% for CSD.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and CSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer