PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNORX vs. FJPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than FJPNX's 21.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has underperformed FJPNX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while FJPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.


FNORX

1D
2.44%
1M
0.42%
6M
1.23%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
10.34%

FJPNX

1D
4.53%
1M
-2.16%
6M
12.57%
YTD
21.40%
1Y
36.34%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
5.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
9.22%25.85%-4.51%20.85%-19.29%12.77%43.03%17.26%-11.56%22.48%
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
21.40%31.66%7.37%15.86%-22.23%3.11%25.42%25.74%-14.84%29.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and FJPNX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1995

0.47

Over the past year, FNORX and FJPNX have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNORX vs. FJPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNORX
FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FJPNX
FJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNORXFJPNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.89

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

9.33

-4.32

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FJPNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and FJPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FJPNX's maximum drawdown of -64.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and FJPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.72%

-64.83%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-12.74%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.19%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.15%

-36.23%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-36.23%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-7.05%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-24.80%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

3.94%

+0.29%

Volatility

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) is 4.39%, while Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that FNORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

8.50%

-4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

19.66%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

23.54%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

20.57%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.53%

+0.25%

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPNX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than FJPNX's 8.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
8.20%9.95%4.85%3.71%0.00%11.58%1.79%1.18%0.38%0.23%1.22%0.64%
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
8.00%8.74%6.14%0.05%0.00%14.85%3.29%4.59%10.78%3.13%1.71%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNORX and FJPNX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJPNX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FNORX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs FJPNX's -64.83%.

FJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNORX and FJPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer