PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNORX vs. FJPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than FJPNX's 24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has underperformed FJPNX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while FJPNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.


FNORX

1D
-1.12%
1M
2.00%
YTD
11.87%
6M
17.71%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
9.62%

FJPNX

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.50%
YTD
24.63%
6M
25.50%
1Y
42.79%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
11.87%25.85%-4.51%20.85%-19.29%12.77%43.03%17.26%-11.56%22.48%
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
24.63%31.66%7.37%15.86%-22.23%3.11%25.42%25.74%-14.84%29.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and FJPNX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 1995

0.47

The correlation between FNORX and FJPNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNORX vs. FJPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNORX
FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FJPNX
FJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.15

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

2.90

-1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.63

-2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.73

13.87

-9.15

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FJPNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and FJPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.15

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.52

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.27

+0.20

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FJPNX's maximum drawdown of -64.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and FJPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.72%

-64.83%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-12.74%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.19%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.15%

-36.23%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-36.23%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-1.52%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-24.90%

+7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.33%

+0.88%

Volatility

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNORXFJPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

5.34%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

16.41%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

21.29%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

19.97%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

18.28%

+0.70%

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPNX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNORX vs. FJPNX - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than FJPNX's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
7.99%9.95%4.85%3.71%0.00%11.58%1.79%1.18%0.38%0.23%1.22%0.64%
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
7.81%8.74%6.14%0.05%0.00%14.85%3.29%4.59%10.78%3.13%1.71%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNORX and FJPNX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJPNX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FNORX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs FJPNX's -64.83%.

FJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNORX and FJPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer