FNORX vs. FPBFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FNORX (Fidelity Nordic Fund) and FPBFX (Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund) are both mutual funds - FNORX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FPBFX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FNORX returned 9.65%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for FPBFX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNORX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for FPBFX.

Performance

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than FPBFX's 33.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has underperformed FPBFX with an annualized return of 9.65%, while FPBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.

FNORX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -4.30%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 15.06%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: 9.65%

FPBFX

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 7.75%
• YTD: 33.43%
• 6M: 34.61%
• 1Y: 61.36%
• 3Y*: 25.97%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNORX Fidelity Nordic Fund	7.85%	25.85%	-4.51%	20.85%	-19.29%	12.77%	43.03%	17.26%	-11.56%	22.48%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	33.43%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	32.92%	32.21%	-18.08%	40.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and FPBFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1995	0.56

The correlation between FNORX and FPBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNORX vs. FPBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNORX

FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 12
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNORX	FPBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.77	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	3.47	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.49	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	4.87	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	17.98	-14.58

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FPBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and FPBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FPBFX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and FPBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNORX	FPBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.72%	-69.06%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-12.25%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.76%	-19.48%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.15%	-37.97%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.15%	-39.85%	+1.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.57%	0.00%	-5.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-17.56%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	3.31%	+0.97%

Volatility

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) is 5.84%, while Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that FNORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNORX	FPBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	9.74%	-3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.09%	18.08%	-3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	21.56%	-4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	19.48%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.99%	17.88%	+1.11%

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FPBFX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNORX vs. FPBFX - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than FPBFX's 6.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNORX Fidelity Nordic Fund	8.11%	8.74%	6.14%	0.05%	0.00%	14.85%	3.29%	4.59%	10.78%	3.13%	1.71%	1.32%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	6.14%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNORX and FPBFX in my portfolio?

FNORX and FPBFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNORX or FPBFX?

FPBFX has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to FNORX (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs FPBFX's -69.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.