FJPNX vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
FJPNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 15, 1992. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013.
Performance
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJPNX Fidelity Japan Fund | 6.17% | 31.66% | 7.37% | 15.86% | -22.23% | 3.11% | 25.42% | 25.74% | -14.84% | 29.26% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -16.89% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJPNX achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -16.89% return.
FJPNX
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 38.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
KWEB
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -16.89%
- 6M
- -29.25%
- 1Y
- -14.27%
- 3Y*
- 0.43%
- 5Y*
- -15.48%
- 10Y*
- -0.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJPNX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FJPNX vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
FJPNX
KWEB
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJPNX | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | -0.48 | +2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | -0.52 | +2.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.45 | +3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | -1.15 | +11.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJPNX | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -0.48 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | -0.33 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | -0.00 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FJPNX and KWEB is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
FJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than KWEB's 7.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJPNX Fidelity Japan Fund | 9.38% | 9.95% | 4.85% | 3.71% | 0.00% | 11.58% | 1.79% | 1.18% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 1.22% | 0.64% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.41% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJPNX drawdown since its inception was -64.83%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPNX and KWEB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJPNX | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.83% | -80.92% | +16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.74% | -31.36% | +18.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -75.23% | +39.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.23% | -80.92% | +44.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.68% | -67.27% | +57.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -34.81% | +9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 12.20% | -8.73% |
Volatility
FJPNX vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 8.58%. This indicates that FJPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FJPNX | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 8.58% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 19.06% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 29.53% | -6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 47.62% | -27.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 39.87% | -21.69% |