PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJPNX vs. ^N225
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FJPNX is traded in USD, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJPNX achieves a 24.63% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FJPNX has outperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 11.48%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.


FJPNX

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.50%
YTD
24.63%
6M
25.50%
1Y
42.79%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.48%

^N225

1D
0.00%
1M
10.19%
YTD
29.72%
6M
31.97%
1Y
58.95%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
24.63%31.66%7.37%15.86%-22.23%3.11%25.42%25.74%-14.84%29.26%
^N225
Nikkei 225
29.72%26.56%7.17%19.21%-20.48%-5.90%22.42%19.73%-10.20%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPNX and ^N225 is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2007

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJPNX vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPNX
FJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

^N225
^N225 Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
^N225 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^N225 Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
^N225 Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
^N225 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
^N225 Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJPNX^N225Difference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.51

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

3.51

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.24

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.87

14.00

-0.13

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the ^N225 Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPNX and ^N225, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJPNX^N225Difference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.51

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.42

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPNX drawdown since its inception was -64.83%, which is greater than ^N225's maximum drawdown of -52.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPNX and ^N225.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPNX^N225Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.83%

-52.37%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.74%

-14.75%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-24.78%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

-36.26%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.23%

-37.97%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.44%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-13.63%

-11.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

4.47%

-1.14%

Volatility

FJPNX vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) is 5.34%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that FJPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPNX^N225Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

8.49%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

20.14%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.29%

25.13%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

23.65%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

21.50%

-3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJPNX and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^N225 has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to FJPNX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJPNX dropped -64.83% vs ^N225's -52.37%.

^N225 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJPNX and ^N225

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer