FNORX vs. FWWFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FNORX (Fidelity Nordic Fund) and FWWFX (Fidelity Worldwide Fund) are both mutual funds - FNORX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FWWFX is a Global Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FNORX returned 9.62%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for FWWFX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNORX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FWWFX.

Performance

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than FWWFX's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has underperformed FWWFX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while FWWFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.95% annualized return.

FNORX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 17.71%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: 14.24%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 9.62%

FWWFX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 19.48%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 40.23%
• 3Y*: 25.03%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: 14.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNORX Fidelity Nordic Fund	11.87%	25.85%	-4.51%	20.85%	-19.29%	12.77%	43.03%	17.26%	-11.56%	22.48%
FWWFX Fidelity Worldwide Fund	19.48%	16.16%	27.65%	24.96%	-25.74%	18.49%	30.91%	28.97%	-4.53%	28.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and FWWFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 1995	0.72

The correlation between FNORX and FWWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNORX vs. FWWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNORX

FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FWWFX

FWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNORX	FWWFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.37	-1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	3.15	-1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	3.50	-1.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	15.18	-10.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FWWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and FWWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNORX	FWWFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	2.37	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.65	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.80	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.55	-0.09

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FWWFX's maximum drawdown of -56.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and FWWFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNORX	FWWFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.72%	-56.54%	-13.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-11.74%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.76%	-22.61%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.15%	-33.72%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.15%	-33.72%	-4.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-0.14%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-9.43%	-8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	2.71%	+1.50%

Volatility

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) is 5.30%, while Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that FNORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNORX	FWWFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	5.97%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	13.70%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	17.40%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	18.88%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	18.79%	+0.19%

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FWWFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNORX vs. FWWFX - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than FWWFX's 9.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNORX Fidelity Nordic Fund	7.81%	8.74%	6.14%	0.05%	0.00%	14.85%	3.29%	4.59%	10.78%	3.13%	1.71%	1.32%
FWWFX Fidelity Worldwide Fund	9.66%	11.54%	14.64%	0.94%	6.29%	12.76%	8.08%	4.87%	9.63%	6.24%	1.22%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNORX and FWWFX in my portfolio?

FNORX and FWWFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNORX or FWWFX?

FWWFX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to FNORX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs FWWFX's -56.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.