PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNORX vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNORX vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 9.67%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


FNORX

1D
2.44%
1M
0.42%
6M
1.23%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
10.34%

EDEN

1D
-2.33%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-5.46%
YTD
0.71%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$542.51K$1.19M$1.06M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNORX vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
9.22%25.85%-4.51%20.85%-19.29%12.77%43.03%17.26%-11.56%22.48%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
0.71%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and EDEN is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012

0.76

The correlation between FNORX and EDEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNORX vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNORX
FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNORX vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNORXEDENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.59

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

1.37

+3.64

FNORX vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and EDEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNORXEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.72%

-36.61%

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-21.17%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-29.31%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.15%

-36.61%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-36.61%

-1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-10.20%

+5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-7.41%

-9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

9.04%

-4.81%

Volatility

FNORX vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) is 4.39%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that FNORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNORXEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

5.77%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

15.53%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

19.78%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

20.37%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

19.20%

-0.42%

FNORX vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNORX vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than EDEN's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
3.04%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
8.00%8.74%6.14%0.05%0.00%14.85%3.29%4.59%10.78%3.13%1.71%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNORX and EDEN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDEN has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to FNORX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

FNORX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNORX and EDEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer