PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNORX vs. FACNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNORX vs. FACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNORX achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than FACNX's 9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FNORX has underperformed FACNX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while FACNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


FNORX

1D
2.44%
1M
0.42%
6M
1.23%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
10.34%

FACNX

1D
0.36%
1M
4.15%
6M
9.88%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
10.17%
ALL TIME*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNORX vs. FACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
9.22%25.85%-4.51%20.85%-19.29%12.77%43.03%17.26%-11.56%22.48%
FACNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A
9.83%25.49%8.83%14.33%-6.44%26.44%4.11%25.42%-14.59%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNORX and FACNX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.66

The correlation between FNORX and FACNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNORX vs. FACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNORX
FNORX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNORX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNORX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FACNX
FACNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNORX vs. FACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNORXFACNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.50

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

7.86

-2.85

FNORX vs. FACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNORX and FACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNORX vs. FACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNORX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FACNX's maximum drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNORX and FACNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNORXFACNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.72%

-58.18%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-7.63%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-12.16%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.15%

-21.12%

-17.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-39.88%

+1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

0.00%

-4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-12.08%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.42%

+1.81%

Volatility

FNORX vs. FACNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) at 2.32%. This indicates that FNORX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNORXFACNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.32%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

10.22%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

12.89%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

15.90%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.36%

+1.42%

FNORX vs. FACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNORX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FACNX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNORX vs. FACNX - Dividend Comparison

FNORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than FACNX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A
4.93%5.41%7.14%3.06%3.79%4.86%2.28%4.13%6.91%0.89%1.31%0.15%
FNORX
Fidelity Nordic Fund
8.00%8.74%6.14%0.05%0.00%14.85%3.29%4.59%10.78%3.13%1.71%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNORX and FACNX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNORX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FACNX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNORX dropped -69.72% vs FACNX's -58.18%.

FACNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNORX and FACNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer