FACNX vs. MPLIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FACNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A) and MPLIX (Praxis International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FACNX returned 9.84%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for MPLIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FACNX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for MPLIX.

Performance

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) and Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACNX achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than MPLIX's 16.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FACNX having a 9.84% annualized return and MPLIX not far ahead at 9.92%.

FACNX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 14.81%
• 3Y*: 15.10%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

MPLIX

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 6M: 17.14%
• 1Y: 33.68%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	4.66%	25.49%	8.83%	14.33%	-6.44%	26.44%	4.11%	25.42%	-14.59%	12.81%
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund	16.64%	29.51%	6.86%	15.07%	-16.16%	7.84%	13.19%	20.43%	-14.51%	25.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FACNX and MPLIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2010	0.79

The correlation between FACNX and MPLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FACNX vs. MPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACNX

FACNX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

MPLIX

MPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
MPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) and Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FACNX	MPLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.11	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.87	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.39	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.78	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	10.73	-4.78

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the MPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACNX and MPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACNX drawdown since its inception was -58.18%, which is greater than MPLIX's maximum drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACNX and MPLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FACNX	MPLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.18%	-35.25%	-22.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.63%	-11.79%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.16%	-13.35%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.12%	-29.78%	+8.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.88%	-35.25%	-4.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	0.00%	-3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.14%	-8.37%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	3.05%	-0.70%

Volatility

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) is 4.13%, while Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that FACNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FACNX	MPLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	6.54%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	13.47%	-3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.97%	15.59%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	15.83%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	16.48%	+0.96%

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACNX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MPLIX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

FACNX vs. MPLIX - Dividend Comparison

FACNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than MPLIX's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FACNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A	5.17%	5.41%	7.14%	3.06%	3.79%	4.86%	2.28%	4.13%	6.91%	0.89%	1.31%	0.15%
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund	2.84%	3.32%	2.97%	3.26%	2.09%	2.49%	1.48%	2.37%	2.49%	1.71%	1.93%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FACNX and MPLIX in my portfolio?

FACNX and MPLIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FACNX or MPLIX?

MPLIX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to FACNX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACNX dropped -58.18% vs MPLIX's -35.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.