FNMAS vs. LFVN
FNMAS (Federal National Mortgage Association) and LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) are both stocks. FNMAS operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services), while LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FNMAS returned 8.08%/yr vs -6.90%/yr for LFVN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNMAS achieves a -38.02% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FNMAS has outperformed LFVN with an annualized return of 8.08%, while LFVN has yielded a comparatively lower -6.90% annualized return.
FNMAS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -20.67%
- 6M
- -24.12%
- YTD
- -38.02%
- 1Y
- -37.85%
- 3Y*
- 61.53%
- 5Y*
- 35.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.87%
LFVN
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- -50.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- -6.90%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.21%
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNMAS Federal National Mortgage Association | -38.02% | 27.66% | 270.50% | 37.61% | -25.00% | -63.64% | -28.20% | 71.94% | -21.02% | 10.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 3.27% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNMAS and LFVN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FNMAS and LFVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FNMAS:
$7.41B
LFVN:
$78.98M
FNMAS:
$2.77
LFVN:
$0.45
FNMAS:
3.41
LFVN:
13.91
FNMAS:
0.00
LFVN:
0.34
FNMAS:
0.35
LFVN:
0.41
FNMAS:
$160.91B
LFVN:
$195.32M
FNMAS:
$85.61B
LFVN:
$152.62M
FNMAS:
$143.41B
LFVN:
$8.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNMAS vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank
FNMAS
LFVN
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNMAS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.90 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.71 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | -0.98 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNMAS drawdown since its inception was -89.36%, smaller than the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMAS and LFVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNMAS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.36% | -99.57% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.27% | -71.73% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.27% | -83.90% | +37.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.55% | -83.90% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.36% | -83.90% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.27% | -93.58% | +47.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -89.58% | +46.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.00% | 51.56% | -28.56% |
Volatility
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMAS) is 6.34%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that FNMAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNMAS | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 12.63% | -6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.33% | 68.07% | -35.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.20% | 76.93% | -36.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 65.98% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 61.91% | -0.64% |
Dividends
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison
FNMAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNMAS Federal National Mortgage Association | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.96% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
Financials
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal National Mortgage Association and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FNMAS vs. LFVN - Profitability Comparison
FNMAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
FNMAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
FNMAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FNMAS and LFVN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to FNMAS (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMAS dropped -89.36% vs LFVN's -99.57%.
LFVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNMAS and LFVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer