FNK vs. TCV
FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and TCV (Towle Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. FNK is passively managed, while TCV is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TCV.
Performance
FNK vs. TCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 27.23% return.
FNK
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
TCV
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- YTD
- 27.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNK vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 11.60% | 6.77% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 27.23% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNK and TCV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNK vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank
FNK
TCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNK vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNK | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNK vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than TCV's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and TCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNK | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -12.23% | -38.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -3.32% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | — | — |
Volatility
FNK vs. TCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNK | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 21.21% | -6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 21.21% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 21.21% | +2.54% |
FNK vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNK vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison
FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than TCV's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.57% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNK and TCV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.57% for TCV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Towle. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.85% for TCV.
Find the right allocation for FNK and TCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer