PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNICX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNICX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNICX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FNICX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 15.52%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.27% annualized return.


FNICX

1D
0.63%
1M
3.93%
YTD
11.23%
6M
13.61%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
15.52%

QQQ

1D
-4.80%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.01%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
21.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNICX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNICX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C
11.23%19.70%33.94%34.88%-26.87%23.48%22.72%28.17%-5.40%27.10%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.92%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FNICX and QQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.89

The correlation between FNICX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNICX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNICX
FNICX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNICX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FNICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNICX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNICX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNICXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.94

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

11.22

+0.78

FNICX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNICX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNICX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNICXQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.11

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.75

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.95

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.40

+0.19

Drawdowns

FNICX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNICX drawdown since its inception was -50.18%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNICX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNICXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.18%

-82.97%

+32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-11.96%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.10%

-22.77%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.17%

-35.12%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.17%

-35.12%

+2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.51%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-32.78%

+25.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.13%

-0.75%

Volatility

FNICX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) is 3.73%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that FNICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNICXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

6.68%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

13.12%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

16.69%

-2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.06%

22.47%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

22.34%

-3.05%

FNICX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNICX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNICX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FNICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.28%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNICX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C
12.28%13.07%8.12%8.07%21.87%15.96%9.88%7.53%16.07%8.64%4.45%4.78%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNICX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to FNICX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNICX dropped -50.18% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNICX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer