PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNICX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNICX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -0.51% return.


FNICX

1D
1.37%
1M
-5.09%
6M
3.78%
YTD
5.75%
1Y
12.54%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
14.70%
ALL TIME*
10.63%

SWLGX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.22%
6M
1.04%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNICX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C
5.75%19.70%33.94%34.88%-26.87%23.48%22.72%28.17%-5.40%-0.43%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
-0.51%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FNICX and SWLGX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FNICX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNICX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNICX
FNICX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FNICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNICX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FNICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNICXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.45

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

1.35

+3.48

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNICX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNICX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNICX drawdown since its inception was -50.18%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNICX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNICXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.18%

-32.69%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-16.16%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.10%

-23.30%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.17%

-32.69%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-8.74%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-7.03%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

5.37%

-2.49%

Volatility

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) is 4.60%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that FNICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNICXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.40%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

14.03%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

17.49%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

21.80%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

22.68%

-3.31%

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNICX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNICX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

FNICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.92%, more than SWLGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNICX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C
12.92%13.07%8.12%8.07%21.87%15.96%9.88%7.53%16.07%8.64%4.45%4.78%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNICX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWLGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to FNICX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNICX dropped -50.18% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

FNICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNICX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer