FNICX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FNICX (Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FNICX returned 14.70%/yr vs 17.98%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FNICX charges 1.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNICX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FNICX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 14.70%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.98% annualized return.

FNICX

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -5.09%
• 6M: 3.78%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 14.70%
• ALL TIME*: 10.63%

FNCMX

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -2.76%
• 6M: 7.39%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 1Y: 22.35%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 17.98%
• ALL TIME*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FNICX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNICX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C	5.75%	19.70%	33.94%	34.88%	-26.87%	23.48%	22.72%	28.17%	-5.40%	27.10%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	8.42%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FNICX and FNCMX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003	0.93

The correlation between FNICX and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNICX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNICX

FNICX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FNICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FNICX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FNICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FNICX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNICX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.07	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.54	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	1.51	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.83	5.07	-0.24

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNICX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNICX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNICX drawdown since its inception was -50.18%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNICX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNICX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.18%	-55.08%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	-13.01%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.10%	-24.20%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.17%	-35.64%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.17%	-35.64%	+3.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-7.19%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-7.84%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	3.87%	-0.99%

Volatility

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C (FNICX) is 4.60%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that FNICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNICX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	5.64%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	14.70%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	18.42%	-2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.36%	22.79%	-3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	22.15%	-2.78%

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNICX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNICX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FNICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.92%, more than FNCMX's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.47%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
FNICX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class C	12.92%	13.07%	8.12%	8.07%	21.87%	15.96%	9.88%	7.53%	16.07%	8.64%	4.45%	4.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNICX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FNICX and FNCMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNICX or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to FNICX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNICX dropped -50.18% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.