PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. TPOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGU vs. TPOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than TPOR's 40.67% return.


FNGU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-12.41%
YTD
3.96%
6M
-3.67%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TPOR

1D
2.38%
1M
28.62%
YTD
40.67%
6M
30.62%
1Y
82.15%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. TPOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and TPOR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.39

FNGU vs. TPOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNGU
TPOR

Technology

60.6%
16.7%

Communication Services

29.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

83.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FNGU
60.6%
TPOR
16.7%

Communication Services

FNGU
29.8%
TPOR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FNGU
9.6%
TPOR

-

Basic Materials

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Consumer Defensive

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Energy

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Financial Services

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Healthcare

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Industrials

FNGU

-

TPOR
83.3%

Real Estate

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Utilities

FNGU

-

TPOR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGU vs. TPOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TPOR
TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. TPOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGUTPORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.43

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

6.93

-6.07

FNGU vs. TPOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the TPOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and TPOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. TPOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum TPOR drawdown of -87.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and TPOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGUTPORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.30%

-87.59%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.55%

-34.00%

-25.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.36%

-25.02%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.25%

-38.65%

+16.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.91%

11.91%

+13.00%

Volatility

FNGU vs. TPOR - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) at 18.63%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGUTPORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.31%

18.63%

+8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.15%

46.21%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.43%

60.44%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.93%

67.98%

+11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.93%

70.97%

+8.96%

FNGU vs. TPOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TPOR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGU vs. TPOR - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
0.65%0.91%1.43%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.96%1.22%8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGU and TPOR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to TPOR (18.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs TPOR's -87.59%.

On 1-year performance, TPOR leads with 82.15% vs 21.24% for FNGU. On fees, TPOR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TPOR has been the lower-risk option at 18.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TPOR has performed better with a 82.15% return vs 21.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPOR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while TPOR tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 1.01% for TPOR.

TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGU and TPOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer