PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. QQQU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGU vs. QQQU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGU vs. QQQU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -35.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQU's -22.68% return.


FNGU

1D
4.35%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-35.43%
6M
-44.05%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQU

1D
2.67%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
-22.68%
6M
-19.92%
1Y
45.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. QQQU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQU's 1.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGU vs. QQQU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. QQQU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGUQQQUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

0.82

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.49

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.40

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.00

4.44

-3.44

FNGU vs. QQQU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the QQQU Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and QQQU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGUQQQUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

0.82

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.66

-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and QQQU is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNGU vs. QQQU - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%.


Drawdowns

FNGU vs. QQQU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, which is greater than QQQU's maximum drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and QQQU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGUQQQUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.84%

-53.70%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.55%

-36.29%

-23.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.94%

-28.64%

-23.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.87%

-13.68%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.51%

11.44%

+11.07%

Volatility

FNGU vs. QQQU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 24.03% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) at 16.87%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGUQQQUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.03%

16.87%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.97%

31.03%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.71%

55.55%

+22.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.80%

54.08%

+26.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.80%

54.08%

+26.72%