PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQU vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQU vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQU achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly higher than MAGX's -13.73% return.


QQQU

1D
-2.93%
1M
-17.71%
YTD
-11.91%
6M
-14.75%
1Y
31.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-2.86%
1M
-17.70%
YTD
-13.73%
6M
-16.51%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQU vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQU
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares
-11.91%32.87%87.67%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-13.73%26.16%85.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQU and MAGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.98

The correlation between QQQU and MAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQU vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQU
MAGX

Technology

43.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

29.1%

-

Communication Services

27.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

32.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQQU
43.3%
MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQU
29.1%
MAGX

-

Communication Services

QQQU
27.6%
MAGX

-

Basic Materials

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Energy

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Financial Services

QQQU

-

MAGX
32.8%

Healthcare

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Industrials

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Real Estate

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Utilities

QQQU

-

MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQU vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQU
QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQU vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQUMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.69

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

2.03

+0.56

QQQU vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQU Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQU and MAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQU vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQU drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQU and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQUMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-54.19%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-37.24%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.31%

-21.36%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-13.79%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

12.59%

-0.47%

Volatility

QQQU vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) have volatilities of 14.57% and 15.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQUMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.57%

15.32%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

31.75%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.29%

41.71%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.21%

53.76%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.21%

53.76%

-0.55%

QQQU vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQU vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, more than MAGX's 2.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, QQQU and MAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAGX has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to QQQU (14.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQU dropped -53.70% vs MAGX's -54.19%.

On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 31.23% vs 25.45% for MAGX. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 14.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 31.23% return vs 25.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QQQU.

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 10.89%, compared with 2.37% for MAGX.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QQQU and 0.95% for MAGX.

QQQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQU and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer