FNGU vs. MUU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU).

FNGU and MUU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. MUU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Oct 9, 2024.

Performance

FNGU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	-35.43%	4.24%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	19.95%	398.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -35.43% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 19.95% return.

FNGU

• 1D: 4.35%
• 1M: -14.02%
• YTD: -35.43%
• 6M: -44.05%
• 1Y: 17.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 9.69%
• 1M: -37.04%
• YTD: 19.95%
• 6M: 205.62%
• 1Y: 790.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

MUU

Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGU	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	6.16	-5.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	3.70	-2.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.49	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	14.42	-14.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	40.98	-39.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGU vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and MUU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGU	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	6.16	-5.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	1.52	-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and MUU is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FNGU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	4.03%	4.27%	0.31%

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.84%	-75.07%	+14.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-52.72%	-6.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.94%	-48.14%	-3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.87%	-25.05%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.51%	18.55%	+3.96%

Volatility

FNGU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) is 24.03%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 46.74%. This indicates that FNGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.03%	46.74%	-22.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.97%	98.12%	-53.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.71%	129.66%	-51.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.80%	127.08%	-46.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.80%	127.08%	-46.28%