FNGU vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGU is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, FNGU returned 64.67% vs 6074.28% for MULL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

FNGU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 36.18% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 33.96%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	36.18%	4.24%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	373.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and MULL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.54

The correlation between FNGU and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGU vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGU	MULL
Technology	60.6%	66.7%
Communication Services	29.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 27
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	46.71	-45.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	7.02	-5.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.89	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	116.34	-115.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	390.40	-387.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	46.71	-45.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	7.45	-7.05

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.84%	-72.29%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-53.09%	-6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	0.00%	-4.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-20.62%	-1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.57%	15.79%	+8.78%

Volatility

FNGU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) is 16.40%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that FNGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	55.41%	-39.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.77%	105.59%	-60.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.50%	132.38%	-74.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.60%	136.22%	-57.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.60%	136.22%	-57.62%

FNGU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and MULL in my portfolio?

FNGU and MULL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGU or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to FNGU (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -60.84% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 64.67% for FNGU. On fees, MULL is cheaper at 1.50% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGU or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 64.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or MULL?

MULL is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between FNGU and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.