FNGU vs. MU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, FNGU returned 25.83% vs 751.18% for MU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FNGU vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -13.99%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: -3.67%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 35.46%
• YTD: 244.07%
• 6M: 307.41%
• 1Y: 751.18%
• 3Y*: 144.69%
• 5Y*: 66.21%
• 10Y*: 55.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	3.96%	3.02%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	244.07%	174.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and MU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.57

The correlation between FNGU and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGU	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	10.83	-10.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	6.14	-5.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.78	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	24.91	-24.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	94.64	-93.78

FNGU vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-98.25%	+36.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-30.28%	-29.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.36%	-9.07%	-18.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-58.16%	+35.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.91%	7.95%	+16.96%

Volatility

FNGU vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) is 27.31%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that FNGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.31%	32.86%	-5.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.15%	57.74%	-7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.43%	69.66%	-8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.93%	53.18%	+26.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.93%	50.12%	+29.81%

Dividends

FNGU vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and MU in my portfolio?

FNGU and MU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGU or MU?

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to FNGU (27.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.