PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. FNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 36.18% return, which is significantly higher than FNGLX's 12.77% return.


FNGU

1D
-3.75%
1M
33.96%
YTD
36.18%
6M
16.22%
1Y
64.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNGLX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.84%
YTD
12.77%
6M
14.49%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and FNGLX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.72

The correlation between FNGU and FNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGU vs. FNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGLX
FNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGUFNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.98

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

13.13

-10.49

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and FNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGUFNGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.32

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.73

-0.33

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, which is greater than FNGLX's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and FNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGUFNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.84%

-31.22%

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.55%

-9.90%

-49.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

0.00%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.06%

-5.46%

-16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.57%

2.23%

+22.34%

Volatility

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) at 4.32%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGUFNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.40%

4.32%

+12.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.77%

10.56%

+34.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.50%

12.73%

+44.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.60%

14.98%

+63.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.60%

16.06%

+62.54%

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGLX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGU vs. FNGLX - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6
6.07%4.94%2.04%2.36%10.48%8.88%4.70%6.51%8.88%1.06%
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGU and FNGLX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGU has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to FNGLX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -60.84% vs FNGLX's -31.22%.

FNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGU and FNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer