PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGLX vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGLX vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNGLX having a 10.83% return and COST slightly higher at 10.87%.


FNGLX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.16%
6M
7.04%
YTD
10.83%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.25%

COST

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.55%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
0.52%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
18.51%
10Y*
21.10%
ALL TIME*
16.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.83B$2.11B$2.34B
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNGLX vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6
10.83%23.45%13.95%19.61%-17.95%16.30%17.81%26.88%-7.97%8.02%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
10.87%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGLX and COST is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.42

The correlation between FNGLX and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGLX vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGLX
FNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGLX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGLXCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.03

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.12

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

0.26

+8.38

FNGLX vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGLX and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGLX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGLX and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGLXCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-53.39%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-16.57%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-20.74%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-31.40%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-12.88%

+10.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-13.36%

+7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

7.81%

-5.43%

Volatility

FNGLX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) is 4.52%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that FNGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGLXCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

7.34%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

15.13%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

19.96%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.25%

22.93%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

22.03%

-5.92%

Dividends

FNGLX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than COST's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.58%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
FNGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6
6.17%4.94%2.04%2.36%10.48%8.88%4.70%6.51%8.88%1.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGLX and COST have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COST has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to FNGLX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGLX dropped -31.22% vs COST's -53.39%.

FNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGLX and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer