FNGU vs. DBE
FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGU returned 64.67% vs 84.41% for DBE. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
FNGU vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 36.18% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
FNGU
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- 33.96%
- YTD
- 36.18%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 64.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
FNGU vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 36.18% | 4.24% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGU and DBE is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.09 |
The correlation between FNGU and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGU vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
FNGU
DBE
FNGU vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGU | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 5.89 | -4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 11.53 | -8.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGU | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.43 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.09 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
FNGU vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGU | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.84% | -86.69% | +25.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.55% | -14.41% | -45.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -30.27% | +25.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -57.31% | +35.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.57% | 7.35% | +17.22% |
Volatility
FNGU vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 12.95%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGU | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | 12.95% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.77% | 30.86% | +13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.50% | 34.97% | +22.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.60% | 29.39% | +49.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.60% | 28.33% | +50.27% |
FNGU vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGU vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGU and DBE have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGU has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to DBE (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -60.84% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 64.67% for FNGU. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 12.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 64.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.
FNGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGU and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer