FNGS vs. MOB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index, while MOB (Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares) is a stock. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FNGS vs. MOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than MOB's 2.30% return.

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

MOB

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: -11.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGS vs. MOB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	-5.38%
MOB Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares	2.30%	-25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGS and MOB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

FNGS vs. MOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MOB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGS vs. MOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGS	MOB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	—	—

Drawdowns

FNGS vs. MOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MOB drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and MOB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGS	MOB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	-50.00%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	-32.61%	+22.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-29.98%	+19.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FNGS	MOB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.65%	112.49%	-90.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.10%	112.49%	-82.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.17%	112.49%	-81.32%

Dividends

FNGS vs. MOB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGS nor MOB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGS and MOB in my portfolio?

FNGS and MOB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.