FNGS vs. DBE
FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGS returned 22.01%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for DBE. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
FNGS vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
FNGS vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 16.26% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.91% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and DBE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between FNGS and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGS vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
FNGS
DBE
FNGS vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGS | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 5.89 | -4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 11.53 | -7.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGS | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.43 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.09 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGS | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -86.69% | +37.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -14.41% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.77% | -23.89% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | -38.74% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -30.27% | +28.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -57.31% | +46.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 7.35% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FNGS vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 5.64%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGS | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 12.95% | -7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 30.86% | -15.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 34.97% | -14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 29.39% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.12% | 28.33% | +2.79% |
FNGS vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGS vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGS and DBE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to FNGS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGS dropped -48.98% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 22.01% vs 19.66% for DBE. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 19.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.
FNGS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FNGS and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGS and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer