PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGO vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGO vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-25.13%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%1.27%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-1.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's -1.36% return.


FNGO

1D
8.94%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-25.13%
6M
-30.39%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
51.07%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*

XTJL

1D
2.47%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.27%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGO vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOXTJLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.86

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

1.18

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.78

7.42

-5.64

FNGO vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and XTJL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.86

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and XTJL is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNGO vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGO nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and XTJL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-23.24%

-55.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-13.81%

-28.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.61%

-2.77%

-34.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.16%

-4.18%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.00%

2.19%

+12.81%

Volatility

FNGO vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 4.44%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGOXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.84%

4.44%

+11.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

6.27%

+24.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.54%

18.18%

+36.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.28%

15.46%

+44.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

15.46%

+46.45%