FNGO vs. QQQU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) and QQQU (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FNGO tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%) while QQQU tracks the The Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGO returned 54.81% vs 60.01% for QQQU. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNGO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for QQQU.

Performance

FNGO vs. QQQU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly higher than QQQU's 3.96% return.

FNGO

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 23.13%
• YTD: 29.63%
• 6M: 17.47%
• 1Y: 54.81%
• 3Y*: 62.64%
• 5Y*: 30.44%
• 10Y*: —

QQQU

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 60.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. QQQU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	29.63%	25.49%	56.54%
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares	3.96%	32.87%	81.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and QQQU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.87

The correlation between FNGO and QQQU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGO vs. QQQU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGO	QQQU
Technology	59.9%	15.8%
Communication Services	28.8%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	10.7%
Financial Services	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. QQQU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 32
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QQQU

QQQU Risk / Return Rank: 37
QQQU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QQQU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQQU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QQQU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
QQQU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. QQQU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGO	QQQU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.51	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.03	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.66	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	5.18	-1.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGO vs. QQQU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the QQQU Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and QQQU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGO	QQQU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.51	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.97	-0.30

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. QQQU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than QQQU's maximum drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and QQQU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	QQQU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-53.70%	-24.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-36.29%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-7.14%	+4.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-13.34%	-10.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	11.62%	+4.59%

Volatility

FNGO vs. QQQU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) at 9.30%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	QQQU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	9.30%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.58%	28.20%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.56%	39.87%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.24%	52.99%	+7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.54%	52.99%	+8.55%

FNGO vs. QQQU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQU's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGO vs. QQQU - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares	9.23%	9.62%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGO and QQQU in my portfolio?

FNGO and QQQU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGO or QQQU?

FNGO has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to QQQU (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs QQQU's -53.70%.

Which ETF is better, FNGO or QQQU?

On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 60.01% vs 54.81% for FNGO. On fees, FNGO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGO or QQQU?

Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 60.01% return vs 54.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGO or QQQU?

FNGO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QQQU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGO or QQQU?

QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 9.23%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.

What is the main difference between FNGO and QQQU?

FNGO tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while QQQU tracks The Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 1.07% for QQQU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.