FNGO vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

FNGO and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGO is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). It was launched on Aug 1, 2018. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. Both FNGO and NRGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FNGO vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGO vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	-22.92%	16.65%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	-33.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a -22.92% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.

FNGO

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: -22.92%
• 6M: -28.65%
• 1Y: 28.52%
• 3Y*: 52.54%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGO and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

FNGO

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 31
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGO	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	0.79	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	1.48	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	1.29	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	2.64	-0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGO vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGO	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	0.79	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.61	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and NRGU is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FNGO vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGO nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-57.50%	-20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-55.24%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.78%	-17.40%	-18.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.17%	-25.38%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.17%	27.12%	-11.95%

Volatility

FNGO vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is 16.20%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.31%. This indicates that FNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.20%	23.31%	-7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.54%	50.27%	-19.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.60%	88.18%	-33.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.29%	87.12%	-26.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.90%	87.12%	-25.22%