PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGO vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.68% return.


FNGO

1D
-1.60%
1M
-7.03%
YTD
8.91%
6M
3.86%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
49.78%
5Y*
25.62%
10Y*

JNJ

1D
1.07%
1M
5.14%
YTD
17.68%
6M
15.11%
1Y
57.60%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
8.91%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%28.38%238.00%79.61%-39.85%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
17.68%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and JNJ is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.05

The correlation between FNGO and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGOJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.61

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

5.28

-4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

15.52

-13.91

FNGO vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-50.67%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-10.96%

-31.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.64%

-15.95%

-31.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

-18.41%

-59.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.46%

-2.54%

-15.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.87%

-11.90%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.45%

3.72%

+12.73%

Volatility

FNGO vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGOJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.58%

5.47%

+12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

12.16%

+21.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.88%

16.94%

+24.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.50%

16.87%

+43.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.61%

18.48%

+43.13%

Dividends

FNGO vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.18%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGO and JNJ have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGO has higher volatility (17.58%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGO and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer